Paper detail

Using the topology of large-scale structure in the WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey as a cosmological standard ruler

We present new and accurate measurements of the cosmic distance-redshift relation, spanning 0.2 < z < 1, using the topology of large-scale structure as a cosmological standard ruler. Our results derive from an analysis of the Minkowski functionals of the density field traced by the WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey. The Minkowski functionals are a set of statistics which completely describe the topological nature of each isodensity surface within the field, as a function of the density value. Given the shape of the underlying matter power spectrum, measured by fluctuations in the Cosmic Microwave Background radiation, the expected amplitudes of the Minkowski functionals are specified as an excursion set of a Gaussian random field, with minimal non-Gaussian corrections for the smoothing scales > 10 Mpc/h considered in this analysis. The measured amplitudes then determine the cosmic distance D_V(z), which we obtain with 3-7% accuracies in six independent redshift slices, with the standard ruler originating in the known curvature of the model power spectrum at the smoothing scale. We introduce a new method for correcting the topological statistics for the sparse-sampling of the density field by the galaxy tracers, and validate our overall methodology using mock catalogues from N-body simulations. Our distance measurements are consistent with standard models which describe the cosmic expansion history, and with previous analyses of baryon acoustic oscillations (BAOs) detected by the WiggleZ Survey, with the topological results yielding a higher distance precision by a factor of 2. However, the full redshift-space power-spectrum shape is required to recover the topological distances, in contrast to the preferred length scale imprinted by BAOs, which is determined by simpler physics.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.