Paper detail

Using the Evolution of Clusters to Constrain Omega

The population of rich galaxy clusters evolves much more rapidly in a universe with critical density than one with low density, thus offering the possibility of determining the cosmological density parameter, Omega_0. We quantify this evolution using the Press-Schechter formalism which we extend to flat models with a cosmological constant. Using new large N-body simulations, we verify that this formalism accurately predicts the abundance of rich clusters as a function of redshift in various cosmologies. We normalise the models by comparing them to the local abundance of clusters as a function of their X-ray temperature which we rederive from data compiled by Henry & Arnaud. This gives values of the rms density fluctuation in spheres of radius 8 Mpc/h of sigma_8 = (0.50+/- 0.04) Omega_0^{-0.47+0.10 Omega_0} if Lambda_0=0 and sigma_8 = (0.50 +/- 0.04) Omega_0^{-0.53+0.13 Omega_0} if Lambda_0=1-Omega_0. These values depend very weakly on the shape of the power spectrum. We then examine how the distributions of mass, X-ray temperature and Sunyaev-Zel'dovich decrement evolve as a function of Omega_0. We present the expected distributions at z=0.33 and z=0.5 and the predicted number counts of the largest clusters. We find that even at z=0.33, these distributions depend very strongly on Omega_0 and only weakly on Lambda_0. For example, at this redshift, we expect 20 times as many clusters per comoving volume with M>3.5 10^{14} Msol/h and 5 times as many clusters with kT>5 keV if Omega_0=0.3 than if Omega_0=1. The splitting in the integrated counts is enhanced by the larger volume element in low Omega_0 models. There is therefore a real prospect of estimating Omega_0 from forthcoming surveys of intermediate redshift clusters that will determine their masses, X-ray temperatures or SZ decrements.

preprint1996arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.