Paper detail

Using the Carnot cycle to determine changes of the phase transition temperature

The Clausius-Clapeyron relation and its analogs in other first-order phase transitions, such as type-I superconductors, are derived using very elementary methods, without appealing to the more advanced concepts of entropy or Gibbs free energy. The reasoning is based on Kelvin's formulation of the second law of thermodynamics, and should be accessible to high school students. After recalling some basic facts about the Carnot cycle, we present two very different systems that undergo discontinuous phase transitions (ice/water and normal/superconductor), and construct engines that exploit the properties of these systems to produce work. In each case, we show that if the transition temperature $T_tr$ were independent of other parameters, such as pressure or magnetic field, it would be possible to violate Kelvin's principle, i.e., to construct a perpetuum mobile of the second kind. Since the proposed cyclic processes can be realized reversibly in the limit of infinitesimal changes in temperature, their efficiencies must be equal to that of an ordinary Carnot cycle. We immediately obtain an equation of the form $dT /dX = f(T, X)$, which governs how the transition temperature changes with the parameter $X$.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.