Paper detail

Using structural and evolutionary information to detect and correct pyrosequencing errors in non-coding RNAs

Analysis of the sequence-structure relationship in RNA molecules are essential to evolutionary studies but also to concrete applications such as error-correction methodologies in sequencing technologies. The prohibitive sizes of the mutational and conformational landscapes combined with the volume of data to proceed require efficient algorithms to compute sequence-structure properties. More specifically, here we aim to calculate which mutations increase the most the likelihood of a sequence to a given structure and RNA family. In this paper, we introduce RNApyro, an efficient linear-time and space inside-outside algorithm that computes exact mutational probabilities under secondary structure and evolutionary constraints given as a multiple sequence alignment with a consensus structure. We develop a scoring scheme combining classical stacking base pair energies to novel isostericity scales, and apply our techniques to correct point-wise errors in 5s and 16s rRNA sequences. Our results suggest that RNApyro is a promising algorithm to complement existing tools in the NGS error-correction pipeline.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.