Paper detail

Using realistic host galaxy metallicities to improve the GRB X-ray equivalent total hydrogen column density and constrain the intergalactic medium density

It is known that the GRB equivalent hydrogen column density (NHX) changes with redshift and that, typically, NHX is greater than the GRB host neutral hydrogen column density. We have compiled a large sample of data for GRB NHX and metallicity [X/H]. The main aims of this paper are to generate improved NHX for our sample by using actual metallicities, dust corrected where available for detections, and for the remaining GRB, a more realistic average intrinsic metallicity using a standard adjustment from solar. Then, by approximating the GRB host intrinsic hydrogen column density using the measured neutral column (NHI,IC) adjusted for the ionisation fraction, we isolate a more accurate estimate for the intergalactic medium (IGM) contribution. The GRB sample mean metallicity is = -1.17+/-0.09 rms (or 0.07+/-0.05 Z/Zsol) from a sample of 36 GRB with a redshift 1.76 < z < 5.91, substantially lower than the assumption of solar metallicity used as standard for many fitted NHX . Lower GRB host mean metallicity results in increased estimated NHX with the correction scaling with redshift as log (NHX cm-2) = (0.59+/-0.04)log(1+z) + 0.18+/-0.02. Of the 128 GRB with data for both NHX and NHI,IC in our sample, only 6 have NHI,IC > NHX when revised for realistic metallicity, compared to 32 when solar metallicity is assumed. The lower envelope of the revised NHX - NHI,IC, plotted against redshift can be fit by log(NHX - NHI,IC cm-2) =20.3 + 2.4 log(1+z). This is taken to be an estimate for the maximum IGM hydrogen column density as a function of redshift. Using this approach, we estimate an upper limit to the hydrogen density at redshift zero (n0) to be consistent with n0 = 0.17 x 10-7cm-3.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.