Paper detail

Using Random Walks for Iterative Phase Estimation

In recent years there has been substantial development in algorithms for quantum phase estimation. In this work we provide a new approach to online Bayesian phase estimation that achieves Heisenberg limited scaling that requires exponentially less classical processing time with the desired error tolerance than existing Bayesian methods. This practically means that we can perform an update in microseconds on a CPU as opposed to milliseconds for existing particle filter methods. Our approach assumes that the prior distribution is Gaussian and exploits the fact, when optimal experiments are chosen, the mean of the prior distribution is given by the position of a random walker whose moves are dictated by the measurement outcomes. We then argue from arguments based on the Fisher information that our algorithm provides a near-optimal analysis of the data. This work shows that online Bayesian inference is practical, efficient and ready for deployment in modern FPGA driven adaptive experiments.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.