Paper detail

Using query frequencies in tree-based revocation for certificateless authentication in VANETs

Revocation of dishonest users is not an easy problem. This paper proposes a new way to manage revocation of pseudonyms in vehicular ad-hoc networks when using identity-based authentication to increase efficiency and security through certificateless authentication. In order to improve the performance of revocation lists, this paper proposes the use of a data structure based on authenticated dynamic hash k-ary trees and the frequency with which revoked pseudonyms are consulted. The use of the knowledge about the frequency of consultation of revoked pseudonyms allows an easier access to the most popular revoked pseudonyms to the detriment of revoked pseudonyms that are the least consulted. Accordingly, the proposal is especially useful in urban environments where there are vehicles that spend more time on road than others, such as public service vehicles.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.