Paper detail

Using Neighborhood Beyond One Hop in Disruption-Tolerant Networks

Most disruption-tolerant networking (DTN) protocols available in the literature have focused on mere contact and intercontact characteristics to make forwarding decisions. Nevertheless, there is a world behind contacts: just because one node is not in contact with some potential destination, it does not mean that this node is alone. There may be interesting end-to-end transmission opportunities through other nearby nodes. Existing protocols miss such possibilities by maintaining a simple contact-based view of the network. In this paper, we investigate how the vicinity of a node evolves through time and whether such information can be useful when routing data. We observe a clear tradeoff between routing performance and the cost for monitoring the neighborhood. Our analyses suggest that limiting a node's neighborhood view to three or four hops is more than enough to significantly improve forwarding efficiency without incurring prohibitive overhead.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.