Paper detail

Using Name Confusion to Enhance Security

We introduce a novel concept, called Name Confusion, and demonstrate how it can be employed to thwart multiple classes of code-reuse attacks. By building upon Name Confusion, we derive Phantom Name System (PNS): a security protocol that provides multiple names (addresses) to program instructions. Unlike the conventional model of virtual memory with a one-to-one mapping between instructions and virtual memory addresses, PNS creates N mappings for the same instruction, and randomly switches between them at runtime. PNS achieves fast randomization, at the granularity of basic blocks, which mitigates a class of attacks known as (just-in-time) code-reuse. If an attacker uses a memory safety-related vulnerability to cause any of the instruction addresses to be different from the one chosen during a fetch, the exploited program will crash. We quantitatively evaluate how PNS mitigates real-world code-reuse attacks by reducing the success probability of typical exploits to approximately $10^{-12}$. We implement PNS and validate it by running SPEC CPU2017 benchmark suite. We further verify its practicality by adding it to a RISC-V core on an FPGA. Lastly, PNS is mainly designed for resource constrained (wimpy) devices and has negligible performance overhead, compared to commercially-available, state-of-the-art, hardware-based protections.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.