Paper detail

Using measurements of the cosmic bulk flow to constrain $f(R)$ Gravity

As an alternative explanation for the cosmic acceleration, $f(R)$ theories of gravity can predict an almost identical expansion history to standard $Λ$CDM, yet make very different predictions for the growth of cosmological structures. Measurements of the cosmic bulk flow provides a method for determining the strength of gravity over the history of structure formation. We use the modified gravity N-body code ECOSMOG to simulate dark matter particles and make predictions for the bulk flow magnitude in both $Λ$CDM and $f(R)$ gravity. With the peculiar velocities output by ECOSMOG we determine the bulk flow at depths ranging from $20h^{-1}$Mpc to $50h^{-1}$Mpc, following the redshift and sky distribution of the 2MASS Tully-Fisher survey (2MTF). At each depth, we find that the $Λ$CDM and $f_{R0} = 10^{-5}$ simulations produce bulk flow measurements that are consistent with $Λ$CDM predictions and the 2MTF survey at a $1σ$ level. We also find that adopting an $f(R)$ strength of $f_{R0} = 10^{-3}$ predict a much larger value for the bulk flow, which disagree with $Λ$CDM predictions at all depths considered. We conclude that $f_{R0}$ must be constrained to a level no greater than $10^{-4}$ to agree with bulk flow measurements.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.