Paper detail

Using known zeta-series to derive the Dancs-He series for $\,\ln{2}\,$ and $\,ζ{(2\,n+1)}$

In a recent work, Dancs and He found new `Euler-type' formulas for $\,\ln{2}\,$ and $\,ζ{(2\,n+1)}$, $\,n\,$ being a positive integer, each containing a series that apparently can not be evaluated in closed form, distinctly from $\,ζ{(2\,n)}$, for which the Euler's formula allows us to write it as a rational multiple of $\,π^{2n}$. There in that work, however, the formulas are derived through certain series manipulations, by following Tsumura's strategy, which makes it \emph{curious} --- in the words of those authors themselves --- the appearance of the numbers $\,\ln{2}\,$ and $\,ζ{(2\,n+1)}$. In this short paper, I show how some known zeta-series can be used to derive the Dancs-He series in an alternative manner.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.