Paper detail

Using Fault Injection on the Nanosatellite Subsystems Integration Testing

Since the 2000's, an increased number of nanosatellites have accessed space. However, studies show that the number of unsuccessful nanosatellite missions is very expressive. Moreover, these statistics are correlated to poor verification and validation processes used by hobbyists satellite developers because major space agencies keep high successful ratings even with small/nano satellites missions due to its rigorous V\&V processes. Aiming to improve payloads integration testing of NanosatC-BR-2, a 2-U Cubesat based nanosatellite under development by INPE, the fault injection technique has been used. It is very useful technique to test systems prototypes. We present the design and implementation of a Failure Emulator Mechanism (FEM) on I2C communication bus for testing the interaction among the NCBR2 subsystems, supporting interoperability and robustness requirements verification. The FEM is modelled to work at the communication bus emulating eventual faults of the communicating subsystems in the messages exchanged. Using an Arduino board for the FEM and NI LabView environment it is possible to program the mechanism to inject different faults at the I2C bus during different operation modes. Based on a serial architecture, the FEM will be able to intercept all messages and implement different faults as service and timing faults. The FEM interface with the tester is designed in LabView environment. Control and observation facilities are available to generate and upload the faultload script to FEM Arduino board. The proposed FEM architecture and its implementation are validated using two subsystems under testing prototypes: the OnBoard Data Handling Computer and the Langmuir Probe NCBR2 payload. For this analysis purpose, the prototypes simulate in two different Arduinos boards the expected behavior of each subsystem in the communication.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.