Paper detail

Using concatenated algebraic geometry codes in channel polarization

Polar codes were introduced by Arikan in 2008 and are the first family of error-correcting codes achieving the symmetric capacity of an arbitrary binary-input discrete memoryless channel under low complexity encoding and using an efficient successive cancellation decoding strategy. Recently, non-binary polar codes have been studied, in which one can use different algebraic geometry codes to achieve better error decoding probability. In this paper, we study the performance of binary polar codes that are obtained from non-binary algebraic geometry codes using concatenation. For binary polar codes (i.e. binary kernels) of a given length $n$, we compare numerically the use of short algebraic geometry codes over large fields versus long algebraic geometry codes over small fields. We find that for each $n$ there is an optimal choice. For binary kernels of size up to $n \leq 1,800$ a concatenated Reed-Solomon code outperforms other choices. For larger kernel sizes concatenated Hermitian codes or Suzuki codes will do better.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.