Paper detail

Using Color Refinement to Boost Enumeration and Counting for Acyclic CQs of Binary Schemas

We present an index structure, called the color-index, to boost the evaluation of acyclic conjunctive queries (ACQs) over binary schemas. The color-index is based on the color refinement algorithm, a widely used subroutine for graph isomorphism testing algorithms. Given a database $D$, we use a suitable version of the color refinement algorithm to produce a stable coloring of $D$, an assignment from the active domain of $D$ to a set of colors $C_D$. The main ingredient of the color-index is a particular database $D_c$ whose active domain is $C_D$ and whose size is at most $|D|$. Using the color-index, we can evaluate any free-connex ACQ $Q$ over $D$ with preprocessing time $O(|Q| \cdot |D_c|)$ and constant delay enumeration. Furthermore, we can also count the number of results of $Q$ over $D$ in time $O(|Q| \cdot |D_c|)$. Given that $|D_c|$ could be much smaller than $|D|$ (even constant-size for some families of databases), the color-index is the first index structure for evaluating free-connex ACQs that allows efficient enumeration and counting with performance that may be strictly smaller than the database size.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.