Paper detail

Using Behavioral Interactions from a Mobile Device to Classify the Reader's Prior Familiarity and Goal Conditions

A student reads a textbook to learn a new topic; an attorney leafs through familiar legal documents. Each reader may have a different goal for, and prior knowledge of, their reading. A mobile context, which captures interaction behavior, can provide insights about these reading conditions. In this paper, we focus on understanding the different reading conditions of mobile readers, as such an understanding can facilitate the design of effective personalized features for supporting mobile reading. With this motivation in mind, we analyzed the reading behaviors of 285 Mechanical Turk participants who read articles on mobile devices with different familiarity and reading goal conditions. The data was collected non-invasively, only including behavioral interactions recorded from a mobile phone in a non-laboratory setting. Our findings suggest that features based on touch locations can be used to distinguish among familiarity conditions, while scroll-based features and reading time features can be used to differentiate between reading goal conditions. Using the collected data, we built a model that can predict the reading goal condition (67.5%) significantly more accurately than a baseline model. Our model also predicted the familiarity level (56.2%) marginally more accurately than the baseline. These findings can contribute to developing an evidence-based design of reading support features for mobile reading applications. Furthermore, our study methodology can be easily expanded to different real-world reading environments, leaving much potential for future investigations.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.