Paper detail

Using affine policies to reformulate two-stage Wasserstein distributionally robust linear programs to be independent of sample size

Intensively studied in theory as a promising data-driven tool for decision-making under ambiguity, two-stage distributionally robust optimization (DRO) problems over Wasserstein balls are not necessarily easy to solve in practice. This is partly due to large sample size. In this article, we study a generic two-stage distributionally robust linear program (2-DRLP) over a 1-Wasserstein ball using an affine policy. The 2-DRLP has right-hand-side uncertainty with a rectangular support. Our main contribution is to show that the 2-DRLP problem has a tractable reformulation with a scale independent of sample size. The reformulated problem can be solved within a pre-defined optimality tolerance using robust optimization techniques. To reduce the inevitable conservativeness of the affine policy while preserving independence of sample size, we further develop a method for constructing an uncertainty set with a probabilistic guarantee over which the Wasserstein ball is re-defined. As an application, we present a novel unit commitment model for power systems under uncertainty of renewable energy generation to examine the effectiveness of the proposed 2-DRLP technique. Extensive numerical experiments demonstrate that our model leads to better out-of-sample performance on average than other state-of-the-art distributionally robust unit commitment models while staying computationally competent.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.