Paper detail

User-Sensitive Mobile Interfaces: Accounting for Individual Differences amongst the Blind

Mobile phones pervade our daily lives and play ever expanding roles in many contexts. Their ubiquitousness makes them pivotal in empowering disabled people. However, if no inclusive approaches are provided, it becomes a strong vehicle of exclusion. Even though current solutions try to compensate for the lack of sight, not all information reaches the blind user. Good spatial ability is still required to make sense of the device and its interface, as well as the need to memorize positions on screen or keys and associated actions in a keypad. Those problems are compounded by many individual attributes such as age, age of blindness onset or tactile sensitivity which often are forgotten by designers. Worse, the entire blind population is recurrently thought of as homogeneous (often stereotypically so). Thus all users face the same solutions, ignoring their specific capabilities and needs. We usually ignore this diversity as we have the ability to adapt and become experts in interfaces that were probably maladjusted to begin with. This adaptation is not always within reach. Interaction with mobile devices is highly visually demanding which widens this gap amongst blind people. It is paramount to understand the impact of individual differences and their relationship with demands to enable the deployment of more inclusive solutions. We explore individual differences among blind people and assess how they are related with mobile interface demands, both at low (e.g. performing an on-screen gesture) and high level (text-entry) tasks. Results confirmed that different ability levels have significant impact on the performance attained by a blind person. Particularly, otherwise ignored attributes like tactile acuity, pressure sensitivity, spatial ability or verbal IQ have shown to be matched with specific mobile demands and parametrizations.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.