Paper detail

User-Centric Perspective in Random Access Cell-Free Aided by Spatial Separability

In a cell-free massive multiple-input multiple-output (CF-mMIMO) network, multiple access points (APs) actively cooperate to serve users' equipment (UEs). We consider how the random access (RA) problem can be addressed by such a network under the occurrence of pilot collisions. To find a solution, we embrace the user-centric perspective, which basically dictates that only a preferred set of APs needs to serve a UE. Due to the success of the strongest-user collision resolution (SUCRe) protocol for cellular (Ce) mMIMO, we extend it by considering the new setting. Besides, we establish that the user-centric perspective naturally equips a CF network with robust fundamentals for resolving collisions. We refer to this foundation as spatial separability, which enables multiple colliding UEs to access the network simultaneously. We then propose two novel RA protocols for CF-mMIMO: i) the baseline cell-free (BCF) that resolves collisions with the concept of spatial separability alone, and ii) the cell-free SUCRe (CF-SUCRe) that combines SUCRe and spatial separability principle to resolve collisions. We evaluate our proposed RA protocols against the Ce-SUCRe. Respectively, the BCF and CF-SUCRe can support 7x and 4x more UEs' access on average compared to the Ce-SUCRe with an average energy efficiency gain based on total power consumed (TPC) by the network per access attempt of 52x and 340x. Among our procedures, even with a higher overhead, the CF-SUCRe is superior to BCF regarding TPC per access attempt. This is because the combination of methods for collision resolution allows many APs to be disconnected from the RA process without sacrificing much the performance. Finally, our numerical results presented in this work can be reproduced using the code package available on: github.com/victorcroisfelt/cf-ra-spatial-separability.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.