Paper detail

Use of two-particle simulations for the evaluation of the flocculation rate in the case of insurmountable repulsive barriers

The interaction potential between two colloidal particles typically spans a few nanometers. Hence the correct appraisal of the potential in simulations requires very short time steps. However, it is often possible to combine one many-particle calculation with several two-particle simulations in order to estimate a set of aggregation rates. As in the theory of Fuchs, this procedure combines the evaluation of the fastest flocculation rate with the calculation of several stability ratios. This methodology was already tested in systems which exhibit low repulsive barriers for primary minimum flocculation. In this article, the procedure is modified in order to calculate an average rate for secondary minimum flocculation. The technique is then used to estimate the influence of drop deformation on the aggregation rate of hexadecane-in-water nano-emulsions stabilized with sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS).

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.