Paper detail

Use of Kernel Density Estimation to understand the spatial trends of attacking possessions in rugby league

Despite having the potential to provide significant insights into tactical preparations for future matches, very few studies have considered the spatial trends of team attacking possessions in rugby league. Those which have considered these trends have used grid based aggregation methods, which provide a discrete understanding of rugby league match play but may fail to provide a complete understanding of the spatial trends of attacking possessions due to the dynamic nature of the sport. In this study, we use Kernel Density Estimation (KDE) to provide a continuous understanding of the spatial trends of attacking possessions in rugby league on a team by team basis. We use the Wasserstein distance to understand the differences between teams (i.e. using all of each team's data) and within teams (i.e. using a single team's data against different opponents). Our results show that KDEs are able to provide interesting tactical insights at the between team level. Furthermore, at the within team level, the results are able to show patterns of spatial trends for attacking teams, which are present against some opponents but not others. The results could help sports practitioners to understand opposition teams' previous performances and prepare tactical strategies for matches against them.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.