Paper detail

Use of Correlation Matrix to Assess the Stirring Performance of a Reverberation Chamber: a Comparative Study

The use of correlation matrices to evaluate the number of uncorrelated stirrer positions of reverberation chamber has widespread applications in electromagnetic compatibility. We present a comparative study of recent techniques based on multivariate correlation functions aimed at relating space-frequency inhomogeneities/anisotropies to the reduction of uncorrelated positions. Full wave finite-difference time domain simulations of an actual reverberation chamber are performed through an in-house parallel code. The efficiency of this code enables for capturing extensive inhomogeneous/anisotropic spatial volumes (frequency ranges). The concept of threshold crossing is revised under the light of random field sampling, which is important to the performance of arbitrary reverberation chambers.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.