Paper detail

Uranium at High Pressure from First Principles

The equation of state, structural behavior and phase stability of α-uranium have been investigated up to 1.3 TPa using density functional theory, adopting a simple description of electronic structure that neglects the spin-orbit coupling and strong electronic correlations. The comparison of the enthalpies of Cmcm (alpha-U), bcc, hcp, fcc, and bct predicts that the aplpha-U phase is stable up to a pressure of ~285 GPa, above which it transforms to a bct-U phase. The enthalpy differences between the bct and bcc phase decrease with pressure, but bcc is energetically unfavorable at least up to 1.3 TPa, the upper pressure limit of this study. The enthalpies of the close-packed hcp and fcc phases are 0.7 eV and 1.0 eV higher than that of the stable bct-U phase at a pressure of 1.3 TPa, supporting the wide stability field of the bcc phase. The equation of state, the lattice parameters and the anisotropic compression parameters are in good agreement with experiment up 100 GPa and previous theory. The elastic constants at the equilibrium volume of alpha-U confirm our bulk modulus. This suggests that our simplified description of electronic structure of uranium captures the relevant physics and may be used to describe bonding and other light actinides that show itinerant electronic behavior especially at high pressure.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.