Paper detail

Upper limits on neutrino masses from the 2dFGRS and WMAP: the role of priors

Solar, atmospheric, and reactor neutrino experiments have confirmed neutrino oscillations, implying that neutrinos have non-zero mass, but without pinning down their absolute masses. While it is established that the effect of neutrinos on the evolution of cosmic structure is small, the upper limits derived from large-scale structure data could help significantly to constrain the absolute scale of the neutrino masses. In a recent paper the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey (2dFGRS) team provided an upper limit m_nu,tot < 2.2 eV, i.e. approximately 0.7 eV for each of the three neutrino flavours, or phrased in terms of their contributioin to the matter density, Omega_nu/Omega_m < 0.16. Here we discuss this analysis in greater detail, considering issues of assumed 'priors' like the matter density Omega_m and the bias of the galaxy distribution with respect the dark matter distribution. As the suppression of the power spectrum depends on the ratio Omega_nu/Omega_m, we find that the out-of- fashion Mixed Dark Matter Model, with Omega_nu=0.2, Omega_m=1 and no cosmological constant, fits the 2dFGRS power spectrum and the CMB data reasonably well, but only for a Hubble constant H_0<50 km/s/Mpc. As a consequence, excluding low values of the Hubble constant, e.g. with the HST Key Project is important in order to get a strong constraint on the neutrino masses. We also comment on the improved limit by the WMAP team, and point out that the main neutrino signature comes from the 2dFGRS and the Lyman alpha forest.

preprint2003arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.