Paper detail

Upper limits on bolometric luminosities of ten type Ia supernova progenitors from Chandra observations

We present an analysis of Chandra observations of the position of ten nearby (< 25 Mpc) type Ia supernovae, taken before the explosions. No sources corresponding to progenitors were found in any of the observations. We calculated upper limits on the bolometric luminosities of the progenitors assuming black-body X-ray spectra with temperatures of 30-150 eV. This is inspired by the fact that luminous super-soft X-ray sources have been suggested as the direct progenitors of type Ia supernovae. The upper limits of two supernovae in our sample are comparable to the luminosities of the brightest observed super-soft sources, ruling out such sources as the progenitors of these supernovae. In contrast to Liu et al (2012) we find that for SN2011fe we can rule out Eddington luminosity systems for black body temperatures as low as 40 eV. Our findings are consistent with statistical studies comparing the observed type Ia supernova rate to the number of super-soft sources or the integrated X-ray luminosity in external galaxies. This suggest that either the progenitors of type Ia supernovae are not accreting, nuclear burning white dwarfs, or that they do not look like the classical super-soft sources, e.g. because they are obscured.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.