Paper detail

Upper functions for positive random functionals

The main objective of this paper is to look from the unique point of view at some phenomena arising in different areas of probability theory and mathematical statistics. We will try to understand what is common between classical probabilistic results, such as the law of iterated logarithm for example, and well-known problem in adaptive estimation called price to pay for adaptation. Why exists two different kinds of this price? What relates exponential inequalities for M-estimators, so-called uniform-in-bandwidth consistency in density or regression model and the bounds for modulus of continuity of gaussian random functions defined on a metric space equipped with doubling measure? It turned out that all these and many others problems can be reduced to finding upper functions for a collection real- valued random variables. Each variable is the value of a given sub-additive positive functional of continuous random mapping defined on a totally bounded subset of a metric space.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.