Paper detail

Upper Bounds on the Boolean Rank of Kronecker Products

The Boolean rank of a $0,1$-matrix $A$, denoted $R_\mathbb{B}(A)$, is the smallest number of monochromatic combinatorial rectangles needed to cover the $1$-entries of $A$. In 1988, de Caen, Gregory, and Pullman asked if the Boolean rank of the Kronecker product $C_n \otimes C_n$ is strictly smaller than the square of $R_\mathbb{B}(C_n)$, where $C_n$ is the $n \times n$ matrix with zeros on the diagonal and ones everywhere else (Carib. Conf. Comb. & Comp., 1988). A positive answer was given by Watts for $n=4$ (Linear Alg. and its Appl., 2001). A result of Karchmer, Kushilevitz, and Nisan, motivated by direct-sum questions in non-deterministic communication complexity, implies that the Boolean rank of $C_n \otimes C_n$ grows linearly in that of $C_n$ (SIAM J. Disc. Math., 1995), and thus $R_\mathbb{B}(C_n \otimes C_n) < R_\mathbb{B}(C_n)^2$ for every sufficiently large $n$. Their proof relies on a probabilistic argument. In this work, we present a general method for proving upper bounds on the Boolean rank of Kronecker products of $0,1$-matrices. We use it to affirmatively settle the question of de Caen et al. for all integers $n \geq 7$. We further provide an explicit construction of a cover of $C_n \otimes C_n$, whose number of rectangles nearly matches the optimal asymptotic bound. Our method for proving upper bounds on the Boolean rank of Kronecker products might find applications in different settings as well. We express its potential applicability by extending it to the wider framework of spanoids, recently introduced by Dvir, Gopi, Gu, and Wigderson (SIAM J. Comput., 2020).

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.