Paper detail

Upper Bounds of Schubert Polynomials

Let $w$ be a permutation of $\{1,2,\ldots,n \}$, and let $D(w)$ be the Rothe diagram of $w$. The Schubert polynomial $\mathfrak{S}_w(x)$ can be realized as the dual character of the flagged Weyl module associated to $D(w)$. This implies a coefficient-wise inequality \[\mathrm{Min}_w(x)\leq \mathfrak{S}_w(x)\leq \mathrm{Max}_w(x),\] where both $\mathrm{Min}_w(x)$ and $\mathrm{Max}_w(x)$ are polynomials determined by $D(w)$. Fink, Mészáros and St.$\,$Dizier found that $\mathfrak{S}_w(x)$ equals the lower bound $\mathrm{Min}_w(x)$ if and only if $w$ avoids twelve permutation patterns. In this paper, we show that $\mathfrak{S}_w(x)$ reaches the upper bound $\mathrm{Max}_w(x)$ if and only if $w$ avoids two permutation patterns 1432 and 1423. Similarly, for any given composition $α\in \mathbb{Z}_{\geq 0}^n$, one can define a lower bound $\mathrm{Min}_α(x)$ and an upper bound $\mathrm{Max}_α(x)$ for the key polynomial $κ_α(x)$. Hodges and Yong established that $κ_α(x)$ equals $\mathrm{Min}_α(x)$ if and only if $α$ avoids five composition patterns. We show that $κ_α(x)$ equals $\mathrm{Max}_α(x)$ if and only if $α$ avoids a single composition pattern $(0,2)$. As an application, we obtain that when $α$ avoids $(0,2)$, the key polynomial $κ_α(x)$ is Lorentzian, partially verifying a conjecture of Huh, Matherne, Mészáros and St.$\,$Dizier.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.