Paper detail

Upper Bound of 0.28 eV on the Neutrino Masses from the Largest Photometric Redshift Survey

We present a new upper limit of sum m_ν eV < 0.28 (95% CL) on the sum of the neutrino masses assuming a flat LCDM cosmology. This relaxes slightly to sum m_ν < 0.34 and sum m_ν < 0.47 when quasi non-linear scales are removed and w is not equal to -1, respectively. These bounds are derived from a new photometric redshift catalogue of over 700,000 Luminous Red Galaxies (MegaZ DR7) with a volume of 3.3 (Gpc h^-1)^3, extending over the redshift range 0.45 < z < 0.65 and up to angular scales of l_max = 300. The data are combined with WMAP 5-year CMB fluctuations, Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO), type 1a Supernovae (SNe) and an HST prior on the Hubble parameter. This is the first combined constraint from a photometric redshift catalogue with other cosmological probes. When combined with WMAP this data set proves to be as constraining as the addition of all SNe and BAO data available to date. The upper limit is one of the tightest and `cleanest' constraints on the neutrino mass from cosmology or particle physics. Furthermore, if the aforementioned bounds hold, they all predict that current-to-next generation neutrino experiments, such as KATRIN, are unlikely to obtain a detection.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.