Paper detail

Upper and lower bounds on the rate of decay of the Favard curve length for the four-corner Cantor set

The Favard length of a subset of the plane is defined as the average of its orthogonal projections. This quantity is related to the probabilistic Buffon needle problem; that is, the Favard length of a set is proportional to the probability that a needle or a line that is dropped at random onto the set will intersect the set. If instead of dropping lines onto a set, we drop fixed curves, then the associated Buffon curve probability is proportional to the so-called Favard curve length. As we show in our companion paper, a Besicovitch generalized projection theorem still holds in the setting where lines are replaced by curves. Consequently, the Favard curve length of any purely unrectifiable set is zero. Since the four-corner Cantor set is a compact, purely unrectifiable $1$-set with bounded, non-zero Hausdorff measure, then its Favard curve length equals zero. In this article, we estimate upper and lower bounds for the rate of decay of the Favard curve length of the four-corner Cantor set. Our techniques build on the ideas that have been previously used for the classical Favard length.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.