Paper detail

Uplink and Downlink Rate Analysis of a Full-Duplex C-RAN with Radio Remote Head Association

We characterize the uplink (UL) and downlink (DL) rates of a full-duplex cloud radio access network (C-RAN) with all participate and single best remote radio head (RRH) association schemes. Specifically, multi-antenna equipped RRHs distributed according to a Poisson point process is assumed. The UL and DL sum rate of the single best RRH association scheme is maximized using receive and transmit beamformer designs at the UL and DL RRHs, respectively. In the case of the single best strategy, we study both optimum and sub-optimum schemes based on maximum ratio combining/maximal ratio transmission (MRC/MRT) and zero-forcing/MRT (ZF/MRT) processing. Numerical results show that significant performance improvements can be achieved by using the full-duplex mode as compared to the half-duplex mode. Moreover, the choice of the beamforming design and the RRH association scheme have a major influence on the achievable full-duplex gains.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.