Paper detail

Upgraded Breaking Of The HLS Model: A Full Solution to the tau-e+e- and phi Decay Issues And Its Consequences On g-2 VMD Estimates

The muon anomalous magnetic moment $a_μ$ and the hadronic vacuum polarization are examined using data analyzed within the framework of a suitably broken HLS model. The analysis relies on all available scan data samples and leaves provisionally aside the existing ISR data. Our HLS model based global fit approach allows for a better check of consistency between data sets and we investigate how results depend on different strategies which may be followed. Relying on global fit qualities, we find several acceptable solutions leading to ambiguities in the reconstructed value for $(a_μ)_{th}$. Among these, the most conservative solution is $a_μ^{\rm had,LO}[{\rm HLS \ improved}]=687.72(4.63) \times 10^{-10}$ and $(a_μ)_{th}=11\,659\,175.37(5.31)\times 10^{-10}$ corresponding to a $4.1 σ$ significance for the difference $Δa_μ=(a_μ)_{exp}-(a_μ)_{th}$. It is also shown that the various contributions accessible through the model yield uniformly a factor 2 improvement of their uncertainty. The breaking procedure implemented in the HLS model is an extension of the former procedure based on the BKY mechanism. This yields a quite satisfactory simultaneous description of most $e^+e^-$ annihilation channels up to and including the $ϕ$ meson ($π^+π^-$, $π^0γ$, $ηγ$, $π^+π^-π^0$, $K^+K^-$, $K^0 \bar{K}^0$) and of a set of 10 (mostly radiative) decay widths of light mesons. It also allows to achieve the proof of consistency between the $e^+e^- \to π^+π^-$ annihilation and the $τ^\pm \ra π^\pmπ^0 ν$ decay and gives a solution to the reported problem concerning the measured partial width ratio $Γ(ϕ\to K^+K^-)/Γ(ϕ\to K^0 \bar{K}^0)$. Prospects for improving the VMD based estimates of $a_μ$ are emphasized.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.