Paper detail

Updating the Dartmouth Stellar Evolution Model Grid: Pre-Main-Sequence Models & Magnetic Fields

We present the current status of an effort to create an updated grid of low-mass stellar evolution mass tracks and isochrones computed using the Dartmouth stellar evolution code. Emphasis is placed on reliably extending the present grid to the pre-main-sequence, where modeling uncertainties have the greatest impact. Revisions to the original code release include: updated surface boundary conditions, the introduction of deuterium burning, and magnetic fields. The mass track grid contains models with a mass above 0.1 $M_{\odot}$ and metallicities in the range of -0.5 to +0.5 dex. Magnetic mass tracks are calculated for surface magnetic field strengths between 0.1 kG and 4.0 kG using two different prescriptions for magneto-convection. Standard and magnetic model isochrones are available for ages older than 1 Myr. Tabulated quantities include the stellar fundamental properties, absolute photometric magnitudes, magnetic field properties, convective turnover times, apsidal motion constants, and lithium abundances. The complete grid of mass tracks and isochrones will be made publicly available.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.