Paper detail

Updated results on neutrino mass and mass hierarchy from cosmology with Planck 2018 likelihoods

In this work we update the bounds on $\sum m_ν$ from latest publicly available cosmological data and likelihoods using Bayesian analysis, while explicitly considering particular neutrino mass hierarchies. In the minimal $Λ\textrm{CDM}+\sum m_ν$ model with most recent CMB data from Planck 2018 TT,TE,EE, lowE, and lensing; and BAO data from BOSS DR12, MGS, and 6dFGS, we find that at 95\% C.L. the bounds are: $\sum m_ν<0.12$ eV (degenerate), $\sum m_ν<0.15$ eV (normal), $\sum m_ν<0.17$ eV (inverted). The bounds vary across the different mass orderings due to different priors on $\sum m_ν$. Also, we find that the normal hierarchy is very mildly preferred relative to the inverted, using both minimum $χ^2$ values and Bayesian Evidence ratios. In this paper we also provide bounds on $\sum m_ν$ considering different hierarchies in various extended cosmological models: $Λ\textrm{CDM}+\sum m_ν+r$, $w\textrm{CDM}+\sum m_ν$, $w_0 w_a \textrm{CDM}+\sum m_ν$, $w_0 w_a \textrm{CDM}+\sum m_ν$ with $w(z)\geq -1$, $Λ\textrm{CDM} + \sum m_ν + Ω_k$, and $Λ\textrm{CDM} + \sum m_ν + A_{\textrm{Lens}}$. We do not find any strong evidence of normal hierarchy over inverted hierarchy in the extended models either.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.