Paper detail

Update on the IsoDAR 60 MeV/amu Cyclotron Acceleration Simulations

In this technical report, the work done by members of the DAE$δ$ALUS collaboration on simulating the acceleration of 5 mA of H2+ in the IsoDAR compact isochronous cyclotron is summarized. The findings are that sufficient turn separation between the (N-1)th and Nth turn can be achieved with either initially matched but also with mismatched beams by careful placement of collimators to scrape away halo particles before the beam energy has reached 2 MeV/amu. Here we define &#34;sufficient&#34; as < 200 W beam loss on the septum. In the acceleration simulations, beam losses on the collimators vary from 10% to 25% depending on the initial beam conditions. The collimator placement in the central region, halo formation, and turn separation at the final turn are discussed. Finally, a scheme to further mitigate the risk of beam loss on the extraction septum by placing a narrow stripping foil in front of it is investigated. We also present the findings of a separate study subcontracted to the company AIMA, who investigated injection of H2+ ions through a spiral inflector and accelerating them for four turns. Here the reported beam loss before 2 MeV/amu was 58%, but bunches were not accelerated further, so we are not reporting this as a final result.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.