Paper detail

Update on testing of air-shower modelling using combined data of the Pierre Auger Observatory and phenomenological consequences

The combined data of Fluorescence and Surface Detectors of the Pierre Auger Observatory has recently provided the strongest constraints on the validity of predictions from current models of hadronic interactions. The unmodified predictions of these models on the depth of shower maximum ($X_\text{max}$) and the hadronic part of the ground signal are unable to accurately describe the measured data at a level of more than 5$σ$ in the energy range 3-10 EeV. This inconsistency has been shown to originate not only from the predicted amount of muons at the ground level, but also from the predicted scale of $X_\text{max}$, which must be adjusted to better match the observed data. The resulting deeper $X_\text{max}$ scales of the models imply a heavier mass composition to be interpreted from the $X_\text{max}$ measurements. We show the results of the test with an updated data set of the Pierre Auger Observatory, studying also the energy evolution of the fitted modification parameters and new versions of the models of hadronic interactions. Additionally, we discuss the phenomenological consequences of the deeper $X_\text{max}$ scale of models on the interpretation of the features of the energy spectrum and the muon problem in air-shower modelling.

preprint2025arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.