Paper detail

Up to eleven: radiation from particles with arbitrary energy falling into higher-dimensional black holes

We consider point particles with arbitrary energy per unit mass E that fall radially into a higher-dimensional, nonrotating, asymptotically flat black hole. We compute the energy and linear momentum radiated in this process as functions of E and of the spacetime dimensionality D=n+2 for n=2,...,9 (in some cases we go up to 11). We find that the total energy radiated increases with n for particles falling from rest (E=1). For fixed particle energies 1<E<=2 we show explicitly that the radiation has a local minimum at some critical value of n, and then it increases with n. We conjecture that such a minimum exists also for higher particle energies. The present point-particle calculation breaks down when n=11, because then the radiated energy becomes larger than the particle mass. Quite interestingly, for n=11 the radiated energy predicted by our calculation would also violate Hawking's area bound. This hints at a qualitative change in gravitational radiation emission for n>11. Our results are in very good agreement with numerical simulations of low-energy, unequal-mass black hole collisions in D=5 (that will be reported elsewhere) and they are a useful benchmark for future nonlinear evolutions of the higher-dimensional Einstein equations.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.