Paper detail

Unveiling the nature of 12 new low-luminosity Galactic Globular Cluster Candidates

The Galactic globular cluster system is incomplete, especially in the low latitude regions of the Galactic bulge and disk. We report the physical characterization of twelve star clusters in the Milky Way, most of which are explored here for the first time. Our aim is determining their main physical parameters, such as reddening and extinction, metallicity, age, total luminosity, mean cluster proper motions (PMs), distances, in order to unveil their physical nature. We study the clusters using optical and near-infrared (NIR) datasets. We use the Gaia Early Data Release 3 (EDR3) PMs in order to perform a PM-decontamination procedure and build final catalogues. We match the Gaia EDR3 with the VISTA Variables in the Vía Láctea extended (VVVX) survey and Two Micron All Sky survey (2MASS) in the NIR, in order to construct complete colour-magnitude diagrams (CMDs) and investigate the clusters properties. The extinctions are evaluated using existing reddening maps, spanning $0.09\lesssim A_{Ks}\lesssim 0.86$ mag and $0.89 \lesssim A_{G}\lesssim 4.72$ mag in the NIR and optical, respectively. We obtain their heliocentric distances, that range from about 4 to 20 kpc, placing these clusters at $3\lesssim R_{G}\lesssim 14$ kpc from the Galactic centre. The best PARSEC isochrone fit yields a metallicity range of $-1.8<$[Fe/H]$<+0.3$ and an approximative age range of $2<$Age$<14$ Gyr. We find that all clusters have low-luminosities, with $-6.9<M_{V}<-3.5$ mag. Based on our photometric analysis, we confirm the OC nature for Kronberger100, while we classify Patchick125 as a metal-poor GC, Ferrero54 as a metal-rich GC, and ESO92-18 as a possible old OC or young GC. The classification as GC candidates is also suggested for Kronberger99, Patchick122, Patchick126, Riddle15, FSR190 and Gaia2. We also conclude that Kronberger119 and Kronberger143 might be either old OCs or young GCs.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access13 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.