Paper detail

Untangling two systems of noncrossing curves

We consider two systems of curves $(α_1,...,α_m)$ and $(β_1,...,β_n)$ drawn on a compact two-dimensional surface $M$ with boundary. Each $α_i$ and each $β_j$ is either an arc meeting the boundary of $M$ at its two endpoints, or a closed curve. The $α_i$ are pairwise disjoint except for possibly sharing endpoints, and similarly for the $β_j$. We want to "untangle" the $β_j$ from the $α_i$ by a self-homeomorphism of $M$; more precisely, we seek a homeomorphism $ϕ:M\rightarrow M$ fixing the boundary of $M$ pointwise such that the total number of crossings of the $α_i$ with the $ϕ(β_j)$ is as small as possible. This problem is motivated by an application in the algorithmic theory of embeddings and 3-manifolds. We prove that if $M$ is planar, i.e., a sphere with $h\geq 0$ boundary components ("holes"), then $O(mn)$ crossings can be achieved (independently of $h$), which is asymptotically tight, as an easy lower bound shows. In general, for an arbitrary (orientable or nonorientable) surface $M$ with $h$ holes and of (orientable or nonorientable) genus $g$, we obtain an $O((m+n)^4)$ upper bound, again independent of $h$ and $g$. The proofs rely, among others, on a result concerning simultaneous planar drawings of graphs by Erten and Kobourov.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.