Paper detail

Unsupervised Shape Normality Metric for Severity Quantification

This work describes an unsupervised method to objectively quantify the abnormality of general anatomical shapes. The severity of an anatomical deformity often serves as a determinant in the clinical management of patients. However, experiential bias and distinctive random residuals among specialist individuals bring variability in diagnosis and patient management decisions, irrespective of the objective deformity degree. Therefore, supervised methods are prone to be misled given insufficient labeling of pathological samples that inevitably preserve human bias and inconsistency. Furthermore, subjects demonstrating a specific pathology are naturally rare relative to the normal population. To avoid relying on sufficient pathological samples by fully utilizing the power of normal samples, we propose the shape normality metric (SNM), which requires learning only from normal samples and zero knowledge about the pathology. We represent shapes by landmarks automatically inferred from the data and model the normal group by a multivariate Gaussian distribution. Extensive experiments on different anatomical datasets, including skulls, femurs, scapulae, and humeri, demonstrate that SNM can provide an effective normality measurement, which can significantly detect and indicate pathology. Therefore, SNM offers promising value in a variety of clinical applications.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.