Paper detail

Unsteady cavitation dynamics and frequency lock-in of a freely vibrating hydrofoil at high Reynolds number

We investigate the influence of unsteady partial cavitation on the fluid-structure interaction of a freely vibrating hydrofoil section at high Reynolds numbers. We consider an elastically-mounted NACA66 hydrofoil section that is free to vibrate in the transverse flow direction. Cavitating flow dynamics coupled with the transverse vibration are studied at low angles of attack. For the numerical study, we employ a recently developed unified variational fluid-structure interaction framework based on homogeneous mixture-based cavitation with hybrid URANS-LES turbulence modeling. We first validate the numerical implementation against experimental data for turbulent cavitating flow. For freely oscillating hydrofoil, we observe large-amplitude vibrations during unsteady partial cavitating conditions that are absent in the non-cavitating flow. We identify a frequency lock-in phenomenon as the main source of sustained large-amplitude vibration whereby the unsteady lift forces lock into a sub-harmonic of the hydrofoil natural frequency. During cavity collapse and shedding, we find a periodic generation of clockwise vorticity, leading to unsteady lift generation. We determine the origin of this flow unsteadiness near the trailing edge of the hydrofoil via the interplay between the growing cavity and adverse pressure gradient. The flow-induced structural vibration is observed to have a consequent impact on the cavity dynamics. In the frequency lock-in regime, large coherent cavitating structures are seen over the hydrofoil suction surface undergoing a full cavity growth-detachment-collapse cycle. For the post-lock-in regime, cavity length is shorter and the attached cavity is observed to undergo high frequency spatially localized oscillations. In this regime, cavity shedding is primarily limited to the cavity trailing end and frequency of a complete cavity detachment and shedding event is reduced.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.