Paper detail

Unsteady aerodynamic theory and experiments of hovering membrane wings

We investigate the unsteady lift response of compliant membrane wings in hovering kinematics by combining analytical inviscid theory with experimental results. An unsteady aerodynamic model is derived for a compliant thin aerofoil immersed in incompressible inviscid flow of variable freestream velocity at high angles of attack. The model, representing a spanwise section of a hovering membrane wing, assumes small membrane deformation and attached flow. These assumptions are supported by experiments showing that passive membrane deformation suppresses flow separation when hovering at angles of attack up to $55^\circ$. An analytically derived expression is obtained for the unsteady lift response, incorporating the classical Wagner and Theodorsen functions and the membrane dynamic response. This theoretical expression is validated against experimental water-tank measurements that are performed on hovering membrane wings at angles of attack of $35^\circ$ and $55^\circ$. Data from membrane deformation measurements is applied to the theoretical lift expression, providing the theoretical lift response prediction for each of the available experimental scenarios. Results of the comparison show that the proposed theory accurately predicts unsteady lift contributions from membrane deformation at high angles of attack, provided the deformation remains small and the flow is attached. This agreement between inviscid theory and experimental measurements suggests that when flow separation is suppressed, the unsteady aerodynamic theory is valid well beyond the typical low angle of attack regime.

preprint2025arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.