Paper detail

Unravelling the physics of multiphase AGN winds through emission line tracers

Observations of emission lines in Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) often find fast (~1000 km s^-1) outflows extending to kiloparsec scales, seen in ionised, neutral atomic and molecular gas. In this work we present radiative transfer calculations of emission lines in hydrodynamic simulations of AGN outflows driven by a hot wind bubble, including non-equilibrium chemistry, to explore how these lines trace the physical properties of the multiphase outflow. We find that the hot bubble compresses the line-emitting gas, resulting in higher pressures than in the ambient ISM or that would be produced by the AGN radiation pressure. This implies that observed emission line ratios such as [OIV] 25 $μ$m / [NeII] 12 $μ$m , [NeV] 14 $μ$m / [NeII] 12 $μ$m and [NIII] 57 $μ$m / [NII] 122 $μ$m constrain the presence of the bubble and hence the outflow driving mechanism. However, the line-emitting gas is under-pressurised compared to the hot bubble itself, and much of the line emission arises from gas that is out of pressure, thermal and/or chemical equilibrium. Our results thus suggest that assuming equilibrium conditions, as commonly done in AGN line emission models, is not justified if a hot wind bubble is present. We also find that >50 per cent of the mass outflow rate, momentum flux and kinetic energy flux of the outflow are traced by lines such as [NII] 122 $μ$m and [NeIII] 15 $μ$m (produced in the 10^4 K phase) and [CII] 158 $μ$m (produced in the transition from 10^4 K to 100 K).

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.