Paper detail

Unraveling the Evolution of Defectors in Online Business Games

Anonymous online business environments have a social dilemma situation in it. A dilemma on whether to cooperate or Defect. Defection by a buyer to seller and/or seller to buyer might give each a better profit at the cost of the loss of other. However, if these parties were to interact in future too, a bad past reference might prevent cooperative actions, thus depriving each other from a better gain. The anonymity of the players and an absence of central governing body still make this environment tempting for the defectors. What might be the evolutionary behavior of defectors in such environment? How could their increasing population be controlled? It is these two questions basically that we attempt to address in this research work. A genetic algorithm based spatial iterated prisoners dilemma (SIPD) environment has been used to simulate the experiments. A case where compensation for the looser is provided by the system is modeled and analyzed through experiments. Our results show that compensation can be useful in decreasing defective population in the society, however, this might not be enough for the evolution of a cooperative and reliable society of trustworthy players.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.