Paper detail

Unraveling flavor & naturalness from RUN II to 100 TeV

The importance of incorporating flavor constraints, when providing bounds on new physics is stressed. As is well known it is very difficult for models of new physics to have scales lighter than about 10 TeV once flavor constraints are built in. Although, in the conventional sense, this higher scale means more tuning, it may well make the underlying theory simpler as illustrated with one example. Direct production of new particles heavier than about 5 TeV becomes very difficult at LHC though indirect signals such as deviations in the Higgs to gamma gamma branching ratio may still be possible. Also of course precision studies at low energy facilities can be useful for detecting new phenomena. For direct production of new particles over 5-10 TeV a new high energy collider perhaps at 100 TeV is highly desirable. Indeed, a very strong physics case can be made for such a machine. It can be used to significantly improve many bounds as well as allow a multitude of direct searches in many channels without relying on specific models. Naturalness can be tested by another factor of about 50 past LHC to O($10^{-4}$), a valuable achievement in itself.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.