Paper detail

Unpolarized radiative cylindrical spacetimes: Trapped surfaces and quasilocal energy

We consider the most general vacuum cylindrical spacetimes, which are defined by two global, spacelike, commuting, non-hypersurface-orthogonal Killing vector fields. The cylindrical waves in such spacetimes contain both + and $\times$ polarizations, and are thus said to be unpolarized. We show that there are no trapped cylinders in the spacetime, and present a formal derivation of Thorne's C-energy, based on a Hamiltonian reduction approach. Using the Brown-York quasilocal energy prescription, we compute the actual physical energy (per unit Killing length) of the system, which corresponds to the value of the Hamiltonian that generates unit proper-time translations orthogonal to a given fixed spatial boundary. The C-energy turns out to be a monotonic non-polynomial function of the Brown-York quasilocal energy. Finally, we show that the Brown-York energy at spatial infinity is related to an asymptotic deficit angle in exactly the same manner as the specific mass of a straight cosmic string is to the former.

preprint2002arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.