Paper detail

Unlocking Galactic Wolf-Rayet stars with $\textit{Gaia}$ DR2 I: Distances and absolute magnitudes

We obtain distances to 383 Galactic Wolf-Rayet (WR) stars from $\textit{Gaia}$ DR2 parallaxes and Bayesian methods, with a prior based on H$\mathrm{\scriptsize{II}}$ regions and dust extinction. Distances agree with those from Bailer-Jones et al. for stars up to 2 kpc from the Sun, though deviate thereafter due to differing priors, leading to modest reductions in luminosities for recent WR spectroscopic results. We calculate visual and K-band absolute magnitudes, accounting for dust extinction contributions and binarity, and identify 187 stars with reliable absolute magnitudes. For WR and O stars within 2 kpc, we find a WR/O ratio of 0.09. The distances are used to generate absolute magnitude calibrations and obtain the $\mathrm{\textit{Gaia}}$ colour magnitude diagram for WR stars. Average $v^{\rm WR}$-band absolute magnitudes for WN stars range from -3.6 mag (WN3-4) to -7.0 mag (WN8-9ha), and -3.1 (WO2-4) to -4.6 mag (WC9), with standard deviations of $\sim$0.6 mag. Using H$\mathrm{\scriptsize{II}}$ region scale heights, we identify 31 WR stars at large (3$σ$, |z|$\geq$156 pc) distances from the mid-plane as potential runaways accounting for the Galactic warp, of which only 4 involve WN8-9 stars, contrary to previous claims.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.