Paper detail

Unlocking Biological Workflows for Robust Protein-Text Question Answering: A Dual-Dimensional RAG Framework

Protein-Text Question Answering (QA) is crucial for interpreting biological sequences through natural language. The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) that efficiently leverages biological databases and facilitates reasoning offers a potent approach for it. However, constrained by the standard RAG pipeline, these models often rely on curated, static datasets instead of expert-proven biological workflows, lacking the fine-grained information processing and struggling to generalize to novel (OOD) proteins. To bridge this gap, we propose 2D-ProteinRAG, a novel framework that empowers LLMs to operate within the gold-standard biological research workflow (BLAST). To further extract high-quality information from noisy retrieval contexts, we introduce a dual-dimensional (2D) filtering strategy following the expert analytical paradigms. Horizontal Fine-grained Attribute Alignment utilizes a lightweight, intent-aware discriminative filter to prune irrelevant metadata and align database entries with specific user queries. Vertical Homology-based Semantic Denoising resolves functional contradictions and redundancy across multiple homologs via hierarchical clustering. Extensive evaluations on both In-Distribution and diverse biological OOD benchmarks demonstrate that 2D-ProteinRAG consistently achieves state-of-the-art performance, outperforming fine-tuned baselines and other RAG methods. Our results validate the framework's robustness and scalability, providing a practical solution for interpreting protein functions in real-world scientific scenarios.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.