Paper detail

Universality of the nodal length of bivariate random trigonometric polynomials

We consider random trigonometric polynomials of the form \[ f_n(x,y)=\sum_{1\le k,l \le n} a_{k,l} \cos(kx) \cos(ly), \] where the entries $(a_{k,l})_{k,l\ge 1}$ are i.i.d. random variables that are centered with unit variance. We investigate the length $\ell_K(f_n)$ of the nodal set $Z_K(f_n)$ of the zeros of $f_n$ that belong to a compact set $K \subset \mathbb R^2$. We first establish a local universality result, namely we prove that, as $n$ goes to infinity, the sequence of random variables $n\, \ell_{K/n}(f_n)$ converges in distribution to a universal limit which does not depend on the particular law of the entries. We then show that at a macroscopic scale, the expectation of $\ell_{[0,π]^2}(f_n)/n$ also converges to an universal limit. Our approach provides two main byproducts: (i) a general result regarding the continuity of the volume of the nodal sets with respect to $C^1$-convergence which refines previous findings of Rusakov et al., Iksanov et al. and Azaïs et al., and (ii) a new strategy for proving small ball estimates in random trigonometric models, providing in turn uniform local controls of the nodal volumes.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.