Paper detail

Universality of Makespan in Flowshop Scheduling Problem

Makespan, which is defined as the time difference between the starting time and the terminate time of a sequence of jobs or tasks, as the time to traverse a belt conveyor system, is well known as one of the most important criteria in scheduling problems. It is often used by manufacturing firms in practice in order to improve the operational efficiency with respect to the order of job processing to be performed. It is known that the performance of a machine depends on the particular timing of the job processing even if the job processing order is fixed. That is, the performance of a system with respect to flowshop processing depends on the procedure of scheduling. In this present work, we first discuss the relationship between makespan and several scheduling procedures in detail by using a small example and provide an algorithm for deriving the makespan. Using our proposed algorithm, several numerical experiments are examined so as to reveal the relationship between the typical behavior of makespan and the position of the fiducial machine, with respect to several distinguished distributions of the processing time. We also discuss the behavior of makespan by using the properties of the shape functions used in the context of percolation theory. Our contributions are firstly giving a detail discussion on the universality of makespan in flowshop problems and obtaining several novel properties of makespan, as follows: (1) makespan possesses universality in the sense of being little affected by a change in the probability distribution of the processing time, (2) makespan can be decomposed into the sum of two shape functions, and (3) makespan is less affected by the dispatching rule than by the scheduling procedure.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.