Paper detail

Universality, Correlations, and Rankings in the Brazilian Universities National Admission Examinations

The scores obtained by students that have performed the ENEM exam, the Brazilian High School National Examination used to admit students at the Brazilian universities, is analyzed. The average high school's scores are compared between different disciplines through the Pearson correlation coefficient. The results show a very large correlation between the performance in the different subjects. Even thought the students' scores in the ENEM due to the standardization form a Gaussian, we show that the high schools' scores form a bimodal distribution that can not be used to evaluate and compare performance over time. We also show that this high schools distribution reflects the correlation between school performance and economic level of the students. The ENEM's scores are compared with a Brazilian non standardized exam, the entrance exam at the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. The comparison of the performance of the same individuals in both tests is compared showing that the two tests not only select different abilities but chooses a different set of individuals. Our results indicates that standardized exams might be an interesting tool to compare performance over the years but only of individuals and not of institutions.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.